Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/76243 
Year of Publication: 
2009
Series/Report no.: 
Working Paper No. 0911
Publisher: 
University of Zurich, Socioeconomic Institute, Zurich
Abstract: 
Many politicians blame physician dispensing (PD) to increase health care expenditure and to undermine independence of drug prescription and income leading to a suboptimal medication. Therefore, PD is not allowed in most OECD countries. In Switzerland, PD is allowed in some regions depending on the density of pharmacies. This enables to investigate the difference in prescribing behavior between physician which gain income from prescribing a specific drug and their colleagues which prescribe the drug but do not sell it. Because the considered drugs are bioequivalent we focus on the economic consequence of PD. We analyze the prescribing behavior of Swiss physicians using cross-sectional data between 2005 and 2007 for three important agents. The results support our hypothesis that dispensing physicians have a higher probability of prescribing the drug with the (most likely) higher margin compared to non-dispensing physicians. Further, generic drugs are prescribed more often to patients with higher cost-sharing while patients' cost-sharing is less influential with PD. High-income patients face a much higher probability to receive the brand-name drug due to their lower marginal utility of income. Today's administered reimbursement prices for generics seem to be high enough to gain physicians for prescribing generics because of their high margins.
Subjects: 
physician dispensing
prescribing behavior
generics
brand-name drugs
JEL: 
I10
I18
I19
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
298.83 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.