Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/71583
Authors: 
Besley, Timothy
Prat, Andrea
Year of Publication: 
2003
Series/Report no.: 
IFS Working Papers, Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) 03/09
Abstract: 
Until recently, most policy debates on pensions — especially in Europe — focused on public responsibilities and the difficulties that many publicly funded schemes have in meeting their obligations. However, recent events, not least declines in stock markets, have increased the salience of such issues in privately funded pensions. This has major implications for countries, such as the U.S. and U.K. which have already gone heavily down the private funding route. However, it may also affect the attractiveness of this option as an alternative to public funding. The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) estimates that US companies have accumulated pension deficits of around 300 billion dollars. In the UK, Morgan Stanley estimates that the aggregate pension deficit of the FTSE 100 companies in the end of 2002 is 65 billion pounds. Serious deficits are also reported in private occupational plans in Germany and the Netherlands.
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
373.48 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.