Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Beatty, Timothy K. M.
Crawford, Ian A.
Year of Publication: 
Series/Report no.: 
cemmap working paper CWP17/10
A well known problem with revealed preference methods is that when data are found to satisfy their restrictions it is hard to know whether this should be viewed as a triumph for economic theory, or a warning that these conditions are so undemanding that almost anything goes. This paper allows researchers to make this distinction. Our approach builds on theoretical support in the form of an axiomatic cardinal characterisation of a measure of predictive success due to Selten (1991). We illustrate the idea using a large, nationally representative panel survey of Spanish consumers with broad commodity coverage. The results show that this approach to revealed preference methods can lead us radically to reassess our view of the empirical performance of economic theory.
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
272.83 kB

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.