Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/60960 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2009
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
Staff Report No. 358
Verlag: 
Federal Reserve Bank of New York, New York, NY
Zusammenfassung: 
We argue that the 2005 bankruptcy abuse reform (BAR) contributed to the surge in subprime foreclosures that followed its passage. Before BAR, over-indebted mortgagors could free up income to pay the mortgage by filing bankruptcy and having their unsecured debts discharged. BAR blocks that maneuver for better-off filers by way of a means test. We identify the effects of BAR using state home equity bankruptcy exemptions; filers in low-exemption states were not very protected before BAR, so they would be less affected by the reform. Difference-in-difference regressions confirm four predictions implied by that identification strategy. Our findings add to research trying to explain the surge in subprime foreclosures and to a broader literature on household bankruptcy demand and credit supply.
Schlagwörter: 
Bankruptcy
subprime foreclosures
subprime mortgages
unsecured debt
credit card debt
home equity exemptions
cram-down
JEL: 
G21
G33
K35
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
732.64 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.