Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/58401 
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSchipper, Burkhard C.en
dc.date.accessioned2009-11-10-
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-12T13:34:09Z-
dc.date.available2012-06-12T13:34:09Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/58401-
dc.description.abstractContrary to claims by Gul and Pesendorfer (2008), I show that standard economics makes use of non-choice evidence in a meaningful way. This is because standard economics solely grounded in the theory of choice is incomplete. That is, it has content that can not be revealed with any general choice procedure.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisher|aUniversity of California, Department of Economics |cDavis, CAen
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aWorking Paper |x09-17en
dc.subject.jelA12en
dc.subject.jelB41en
dc.subject.jelC80en
dc.subject.jelC90en
dc.subject.jelD60en
dc.subject.jelD80en
dc.subject.jelD87en
dc.subject.ddc330en
dc.subject.keywordrevealed preferenceen
dc.subject.keywordtheory of choiceen
dc.subject.keywordneuroeconomicsen
dc.subject.keywordnon-choice evidenceen
dc.subject.keywordmachinesen
dc.titleHow mindless is standard economics really?-
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dc.identifier.ppn612514102en
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen

Files in This Item:
File
Size
153.78 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.