Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen:
https://hdl.handle.net/10419/58401
Kompletter Metadatensatz
DublinCore-Feld | Wert | Sprache |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Schipper, Burkhard C. | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-11-10 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-06-12T13:34:09Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2012-06-12T13:34:09Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10419/58401 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Contrary to claims by Gul and Pesendorfer (2008), I show that standard economics makes use of non-choice evidence in a meaningful way. This is because standard economics solely grounded in the theory of choice is incomplete. That is, it has content that can not be revealed with any general choice procedure. | en |
dc.language.iso | eng | en |
dc.publisher | |aUniversity of California, Department of Economics |cDavis, CA | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | |aWorking Paper |x09-17 | en |
dc.subject.jel | A12 | en |
dc.subject.jel | B41 | en |
dc.subject.jel | C80 | en |
dc.subject.jel | C90 | en |
dc.subject.jel | D60 | en |
dc.subject.jel | D80 | en |
dc.subject.jel | D87 | en |
dc.subject.ddc | 330 | en |
dc.subject.keyword | revealed preference | en |
dc.subject.keyword | theory of choice | en |
dc.subject.keyword | neuroeconomics | en |
dc.subject.keyword | non-choice evidence | en |
dc.subject.keyword | machines | en |
dc.title | How mindless is standard economics really? | - |
dc.type | Working Paper | en |
dc.identifier.ppn | 612514102 | en |
dc.rights | http://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungen | en |
Datei(en):
Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.