Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/58401 
Kompletter Metadatensatz
DublinCore-FeldWertSprache
dc.contributor.authorSchipper, Burkhard C.en
dc.date.accessioned2009-11-10-
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-12T13:34:09Z-
dc.date.available2012-06-12T13:34:09Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/58401-
dc.description.abstractContrary to claims by Gul and Pesendorfer (2008), I show that standard economics makes use of non-choice evidence in a meaningful way. This is because standard economics solely grounded in the theory of choice is incomplete. That is, it has content that can not be revealed with any general choice procedure.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisher|aUniversity of California, Department of Economics |cDavis, CAen
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aWorking Paper |x09-17en
dc.subject.jelA12en
dc.subject.jelB41en
dc.subject.jelC80en
dc.subject.jelC90en
dc.subject.jelD60en
dc.subject.jelD80en
dc.subject.jelD87en
dc.subject.ddc330en
dc.subject.keywordrevealed preferenceen
dc.subject.keywordtheory of choiceen
dc.subject.keywordneuroeconomicsen
dc.subject.keywordnon-choice evidenceen
dc.subject.keywordmachinesen
dc.titleHow mindless is standard economics really?-
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dc.identifier.ppn612514102en
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
153.78 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.