Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/53346
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGuivarch, Célineen_US
dc.contributor.authorHallegatte, Stéphaneen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-12-01en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-12-15T11:33:38Z-
dc.date.available2011-12-15T11:33:38Z-
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/53346-
dc.description.abstractPolitical attention has increasingly focused on limiting warming to 2êC. However, to date the only mitigation commitments accompanying this target are the so-called Copenhagen pledges, and these pledges appear to be inconsistent with the 2êC objective. Diverging opinions on whether this inconsistency can or should be resolved have been expressed. This paper clarifies the alternative assumptions underlying these diverging view points and explicits their implications. It first gives simple visualizations of the challenge posed by the 2êC target. It then proposes a decision tree, linking different beliefs on climate change, the achievability of different policies, and current international policy dynamics to various options to move forward on climate change.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisher|aFondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) |cMilanoen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aNota di lavoro // Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei: Climate Change and Sustainable Development |x87.2011en_US
dc.subject.jelQ5en_US
dc.subject.jelQ58en_US
dc.subject.ddc330en_US
dc.subject.keywordFeasibility of 2êC Targeten_US
dc.subject.keywordClimate Change Negotiationsen_US
dc.title2C or not 2C?en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.identifier.ppn675907152en_US
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen_US

Files in This Item:
File
Size
540.21 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.