Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/51718 
Year of Publication: 
2011
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 5695
Publisher: 
Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
Using a sample of professional baseball players from 1871-2007, this paper aims at analyzing a longstanding empirical observation that married men earn significantly more than their single counterparts holding all else equal (the marriage premium). Baseball is a unique case study because it has a long history of statistics collection and numerous direct measurements of productivity. Our results show that the marriage premium also holds for baseball players, where married players earn up to 16 percent more than those who are not married, even after controlling for selection. The results hold only for players in the top third of the ability distribution and post 1975 when changes in the rules that govern wage contracts allowed for players to be valued closer to their true market price. Nonetheless, there do not appear to be clear differences in productivity between married and nonmarried players. We discuss possible reasons why employers may discriminate in favor of married men.
Subjects: 
marriage premium
wage gap
productivity
baseball
JEL: 
J31
J44
J70
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
446.33 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.