Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/46141 
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBhaumik, Sumon K.en
dc.contributor.authorDimova, Ralitzaen
dc.date.accessioned2011-06-14-
dc.date.accessioned2011-06-28T13:56:14Z-
dc.date.available2011-06-28T13:56:14Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.piurn:nbn:de:101:1-201104113446en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10419/46141-
dc.description.abstractUsing firm-level data from nine developing countries we demonstrate that (a) certain institutions like restrictive labour market regulations that are considered to be bad for economic growth might be beneficial for production efficiency, whereas (b) good business environment which is considered to be beneficial for economic growth might have an adverse impact on production efficiency. We argue that our results suggest that the debate about the implications of institutional quality is far from being over, and classification of institutions into good and bad might be premature.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisher|aInstitute for the Study of Labor (IZA) |cBonnen
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aIZA Discussion Papers |x5471en
dc.subject.jelD02en
dc.subject.jelD23en
dc.subject.jelD24en
dc.subject.ddc330en
dc.subject.keywordinstitutional qualityen
dc.subject.keywordproduction efficiencyen
dc.subject.keywordstochastic frontier modelen
dc.subject.stwInstitutionelle Infrastrukturen
dc.subject.stwInstitutionalismusen
dc.subject.stwProduktivitäten
dc.subject.stwWirtschaftliche Effizienzen
dc.subject.stwTextilindustrieen
dc.subject.stwTechnische Effizienzen
dc.subject.stwIndustriestaatenen
dc.titleGood and bad institutions: Is the debate over? ; cross-country firm-level evidence from the textile industry-
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dc.identifier.ppn662043863en
dc.rightshttp://www.econstor.eu/dspace/Nutzungsbedingungenen

Files in This Item:
File
Size
207.68 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.