Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Facchini, Giovanni
Mayda, Anna Maria
Year of Publication: 
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers 3512
In democratic societies individual attitudes of voters represent the foundations of policy making. We start by analyzing patterns in public opinion on migration and find that, across countries of different income levels, only a small minority of voters favour more open migration policies. Next we investigate the determinants of voters' preferences towards immigration from a theoretical and empirical point of view. Our analysis supports the role played by economic channels (labour market, welfare state, efficiency gains) using both the 1995 and 2003 rounds of the ISSP survey. The second part of the paper examines how attitudes translate into a migration policy outcome. We consider two alternative political-economy frameworks: the median voter and the interest groups model. On the one hand, the restrictive policies in place across destination countries and the very low fractions of voters favouring immigration are consistent with the median voter framework. At the same time, given the extent of individual-level opposition to immigration that appears in the data, it is somewhat puzzling, in a median-voter perspective, that migration flows take place at all. Interest-groups dynamics have the potential to explain this puzzle. We find evidence from regression analysis supporting both political-economy frameworks.
immigration policy
median voter
interest groups
political economy
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
297.87 kB

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.