Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/34201 
Year of Publication: 
2006
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 2327
Publisher: 
Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
Measures of inequality and mobility based on self-reported earnings reflect attributes of both the joint distribution of earnings across time and the joint distribution of measurement error and earnings. While classical measurement error would increase measures of inequality and mobility there is substantial evidence that measurement error in earnings is not classical. In this paper we present the analytical links between non-classical measurement error and measures of inequality and mobility. The empirical importance of non-classical measurement error is explored using the Survey of Income and Program Participation matched to tax records. We find that the effects of non-classical measurement error are large. However, these non-classical effects are largely offsetting when estimating mobility. As a result SIPP estimates of mobility are similar to estimates based on tax records, though SIPP estimates of inequality are smaller than estimates based on tax records.
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
599.21 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.