Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorClark, Andrew E.en_US
dc.description.abstractJob quality may usefully be thought of as depending on both job values (how much workers care about different job outcomes) and the job outcomes themselves. Here both cross-section and panel data are used to examine changes in job quality in OECD countries over the 1990s. Despite rising wages and falling hours, overall job satisfaction is either stable or declining. These movements are not due to changes in the type of workers, nor to changes in their job values. A number of pieces of evidence point to stress and hard work as being strong candidates for what has gone wrong with employees' jobs. We find evidence of increasing inequality in a number of job outcomes. Some groups of workers have done better than others: the young and the higher-educated have been insulated against downward movements in job quality, and there is tentative evidence that trade unions may have protected their members against adverse job outcomes.en_US
dc.publisher|aInstitute for the Study of Labor (IZA) |cBonnen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aIZA Discussion Papers |x1610en_US
dc.subject.keywordjob valuesen_US
dc.subject.keywordjob outcomesen_US
dc.subject.keywordjob satisfactionen_US
dc.titleYour money or your life: changing job quality in OECD countriesen_US
dc.type|aWorking Paperen_US

Files in This Item:
333.79 kB

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.