Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/329983 
Year of Publication: 
2022
Citation: 
[Journal:] Games [ISSN:] 2073-4336 [Volume:] 13 [Issue:] 6 [Article No.:] 72 [Year:] 2022 [Pages:] 1-20
Publisher: 
MDPI, Basel
Abstract: 
We argue in favor of a departure from the equilibrium approach in game theory towards the less ambitious goal of describing only the actual behavior of rational players. The notions of Nash equilibrium and its refinements require a specification of the players' choices and beliefs not only along the equilibrium play but also at counterfactual histories. We discuss an alternative-counterfactual-free-approach that focuses on choices and beliefs along the actual play, while being silent on choices and beliefs at unreached histories. Such an approach was introduced in an earlier paper that considered only perfect-information games. Here we extend the analysis to general extensive-form games (allowing for imperfect information) and put forward a behavioral notion of self-confirming play, which is close in spirit to the literature on self-confirming equilibrium. We also extend, to general extensive-form games, the characterization of rational play that is compatible with pure-strategy Nash equilibrium.
Subjects: 
material rationality
behavioral model
self-confirming play
Nash equilibrium
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by Logo
Document Type: 
Article
Appears in Collections:

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.