Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/323352 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2024
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] Computational Economics [ISSN:] 1572-9974 [Volume:] 65 [Issue:] 3 [Publisher:] Springer US [Place:] New York, NY [Year:] 2024 [Pages:] 1265-1298
Verlag: 
Springer US, New York, NY
Zusammenfassung: 
This paper introduces statistical models Wordscores and Wordfish to study and predict banking crises. While Wordscores is akin to supervised learning, Wordfish is analogous to unsupervised learning. Both methods estimate the position of banking distress on a tranquil-to-crisis spectrum. Findings suggest that the two statistical methods signal banking crisis up to two-years in advance, with robust results from AUROC, Granger causality and VAR impulse responses. Both methods outperform random forests in predicting crises using textual data. The Wordscores index highlights increased usage of banking sector nomenclature two years preceding a crisis, and Granger causes a crisis series with one and two lag lengths. Results from the Wordfish technique, a statistical model with Poisson distribution, show the index spikes before and during the Global Financial Crisis, when a large share of the countries in the world encountered banking crises. This paper contributes to literature on text-based models of banking crises by bolstering the preemptive policy responses available to policy makers. Given their early warning signals, both Wordscores and Wordfish can be considered a part of the toolset to monitor the stability and resilience of the banking sector.
Schlagwörter: 
Quantitative analysis of textual data
Banking crises
Text-based models
Early warning signal
JEL: 
C49
C53
C54
C55
G21
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Creative-Commons-Lizenz: 
cc-by Logo
Dokumentart: 
Article
Dokumentversion: 
Published Version

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.