Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/320488 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2025
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 17894
Verlag: 
Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), Bonn
Zusammenfassung: 
There is a lack of understanding of what may drive gender disparities in healthcare utilization and outcomes. We present novel evidence on the impact of physician-patient gender match on healthcare quality using standardized patients (SPs) in an experiment, and collected interactions between SPs and physicians in a primary care setting. We find that, compared with female physicians treating female SPs, female physicians treating male SPs had a 23.4 pp increase in correct diagnosis and a 19.0 pp increase in correct drug prescriptions. Despite substantial gains in healthcare quality, there was no significant rise in medical costs or time investment. The gains in care quality were partly attributed to better physician-patient communications, not the presence of more clinical information. More importantly, female physicians treating male SPs prescribed more unnecessary tests but fewer unnecessary drugs to balance their time commitment and costs. The results suggest the role of gender norms and physician defensive behavior when female physicians treat male SPs. Our findings imply that improving patient centeredness may lead to significant gains in the quality of healthcare with modest costs, while reducing gender gaps in care quality.
Schlagwörter: 
standardized patient
gender disparities
China
healthcare quality
experiment
JEL: 
I11
I12
I14
J16
J22
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
2.43 MB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.