Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authordos Santos, Cláudio H.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Antonio Carlos Macedo een_US
dc.description.abstractMany heterodox strands of thought share both a concern with the study of different phases or growth regimes in the history of capitalism and the use of formal short-run models as an analytical tool. This text suggests that: (1) this strategy is potentially misleading; (2) that the stock-flow consistent (SFC) approach, while providing a general framework that may facilitate the dialogue among those currents, is particularly well suited to all those who think that macroeconomic models may illuminate historical quests; and (3) this approach's main intuitions may be conveyed through the benchmark” Post Keynesian SFC model presented by Dos Santos and Zezza (2008), dispensing with the complex computer simulations that are normally employed by SFC authors.en_US
dc.publisher|aLevy Economics Institute of Bard College |cAnnandale-on-Hudson, NYen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aWorking papers // The Levy Economics Institute |x567en_US
dc.subject.keywordStock-flow consistencyen_US
dc.subject.keywordlong-run analysesen_US
dc.subject.keywordpost Keynesian macroeconomicsen_US
dc.subject.keywordneo-Kaleckian macroeconomicsen_US
dc.subject.keywordrégulation schoolen_US
dc.titleRevisiting (and connecting) Marglin-Bhaduri and Minsky: an SFC look at financialization and profit-led growthen_US
dc.type|aWorking Paperen_US

Files in This Item:
571.01 kB

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.