Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/310973 
Authors: 
Year of Publication: 
2024
Citation: 
[Editor:] Nida-Rümelin, Julian [Editor:] Greger, Timo [Editor:] Oldenbourg, Andreas [Title:] Normative Konstituenzien der Demokratie [ISBN:] 9783111118147 [DOI/URN:] doi:10.1515/9783111118147 [Publisher:] De Gruyter [Place:] Berlin [Year:] 2024 [Pages:] 87-103
Publisher: 
De Gruyter, Berlin
Abstract (Translated): 
This paper challenges widespread assumptions in trust research according to which trust and conflict are opposing terms or where trust is generally seen as a value. Rather, it argues that trust is only valuable if properly justified, and it places such justifications in contexts of social and political conflict. For these purposes, the paper suggests a distinction between a general concept and various conceptions of trust, and it defines the concept of a trust relation as a four-place one. With regard to the justification of trust, a distinction between internal and full justification is introduced, and the justification of trust is linked to relations of justification between trusters and trusted. Finally, trust in conflict(s) emerges where such relations exist among the parties of a conflict, often by way of institutional mediation.
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by-nc-sa Logo
Document Type: 
Book Part
Document Version: 
Published Version

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.