Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/307401 
Year of Publication: 
2023
Citation: 
[Journal:] Labour Economics [ISSN:] 1879-1034 [Volume:] 80 [Article No.:] 102291 [Publisher:] Elsevier [Place:] Amsterdam [Year:] 2023 [Pages:] 1-23
Publisher: 
Elsevier, Amsterdam
Abstract: 
I quantify the perceived changes in hourly wage rates associated with working different hours on the same job for a representative sample of female workers. While part-time working women expect significant hourly wage gains from switching to full-time work - 7% on average - full-time workers expect no effect on current wages when switching to part-time, on average. Perceived pecuniary losses from part-time work are most pronounced among full-time working mothers and women in managerial jobs. Using density forecasts, I document a large uncertainty about the perceived pay gap that correlates with the probability to report extreme wage penalties, as well as with worker characteristics. Comparing beliefs with selectivity-corrected estimates of the objective part-time penalty further indicates that full-time workers on average underestimate part-time wage losses, whereas part-time workers tend to overestimate full-time wage gains.
Subjects: 
Expectations
female labor supply
part-time wage gap
JEL: 
D84
J22
J31
Published Version’s DOI: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by-nc-nd Logo
Document Type: 
Article
Document Version: 
Accepted Manuscript (Postprint)

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.