Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDolls, Mathiasen_US
dc.contributor.authorFuest, Clemensen_US
dc.contributor.authorPeichl, Andreasen_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper analyzes the effectiveness of the tax and transfer systems in the European Union and the US to act as an automatic stabilizer in the current economic crisis. We find that automatic stabilizers absorb 38 per cent of a proportional income shock in the EU, compared to 32 per cent in the US. In the case of an unemployment shock 48 per cent of the shock are absorbed in the EU, compared to 34 per cent in the US. This cushioning of disposable income leads to a demand stabilization of 26 to 35 per cent in the EU and 19 per cent in the US. There is large heterogeneity within the EU. Automatic stabilizers in Eastern and Southern Europe are much lower than in Central and Northern European countries. We also investigate whether countries with weak automatic stabilizers have enacted larger fiscal stimulus programs. We find no evidence supporting this view. However, we find that active fiscal policy is lower in more open economies.en_US
dc.publisher|aCenter for Economic Studies and Ifo Institute (CESifo) |cMunichen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries|aCESifo Working Paper |x2878en_US
dc.subject.keywordautomatic stabilizationen_US
dc.subject.keywordliquidity constraintsen_US
dc.subject.keywordfiscal stimulusen_US
dc.titleAutomatic stabilizers and economic crisis: US vs. Europeen_US
dc.type|aWorking Paperen_US

Files in This Item:
289.64 kB

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.