Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/282172 
Year of Publication: 
2023
Series/Report no.: 
Discussion Paper No. 481
Publisher: 
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München und Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Collaborative Research Center Transregio 190 - Rationality and Competition, München und Berlin
Abstract: 
We study how firms adjust the bundles of management practices they adopt over time, using repeated survey data collected in Germany from 2012 to 2018. By employing unsupervised machine learning, we leverage high-dimensional data on human resource policies to describe clusters of management practices (management styles). Our results suggest that two management styles exist, one of which employs many and highly structured practices, while the other lacks these practices but retains training measures. We document sizeable differences in styles across German firms, which can (only) partially be explained by firm characteristics. Further, we show that management is highly persistent over time, in part because newly adopted practices are discontinued after a short time. We suggest miscalculations of cots-benefit trade-offs and non-fitting corporate culture as potential hindrances of adopting structured management. In light of previous findings that structured management increases firm performance, our findings have important policy implications since they show that firms which are managed in an unstructured way fail to catch up and will continue to underperform.
Subjects: 
management practices
personnel management
panel data analysis
machine learning
JEL: 
M12
D22
C38
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
469.95 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.