Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/282042 
Year of Publication: 
2022
Series/Report no.: 
Discussion Paper No. 350
Publisher: 
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München und Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Collaborative Research Center Transregio 190 - Rationality and Competition, München und Berlin
Abstract: 
We investigate experimentally whether individuals or groups are more lied to, and how lying depends on the group size and the monetary loss inflicted by the lie. We employ an observed cheating game, where an individual's misreport of a privately observed number can monetarily benefit her while causing a loss to either a single individual, a group of two or a group of five. As the privately observed number is known to the experimenter, the game allows to study both, whether the report deviates from the observed number and also by how much. Treatments either vary the individual loss caused by a given lie (keeping the total loss constant), or the total loss (keeping the individual loss constant). We find more lies toward individuals than toward groups. Liars impose a larger loss with their lie when that loss is split among group members rather than borne individually. The size of the group does not affect lying behavior.
Subjects: 
cheating
lying
groups
observed cheating game
laboratory experiment
JEL: 
C91
D82
D91
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
477.71 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.