Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/279044 
Year of Publication: 
2023
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 16346
Publisher: 
Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
This study investigates the effects of unfair enforcement of institutional rules on public good contributions, personal and social norms, and trust. In a preregistered online experiment (n = 1,038), we find that biased institutions reduce rule compliance compared to fair institutions. However, rule enforcement – fair and unfair – reduces norm polarisation compared to no enforcement. We also find that social heterogeneity lowers average trust and induces ingroup favouritism in trust. Finally, we find consistent evidence of peer effects: higher levels of peer compliance raise future compliance and spillover positively into norms and trust. Our study contributes to the literature on behavioural responses to institutional design and strengthens the case for unbiased rule enforcement.
Subjects: 
public goods
compliance
social norms
trust
audits
biased rule enforcement
polarisation
JEL: 
H41
C72
C91
C92
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
644.57 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.