Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Glöckner, Andreas
Betsch, Tilmann
Year of Publication: 
Series/Report no.: 
Preprints of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 2008,5
Brandstätter, Gigerenzer and Hertwig (2006) put forward the priority heuristic (PH) as a fast and frugal heuristic for decisions under risk. According to the PH, individuals do not make trade-offs between gains and probabilities, as proposed by expected utility models such as cumulative prospect theory (CPT), but use information in a non-compensatory manner and ignore information. We conducted three studies to test the PH empirically by analyzing individual choice patterns, decision times and information search parameters in diagnostic decision tasks. Results on all three dependent variables conflict with the predictions of the PH and can be better explained by the CPT. The predictive accuracy of the PH was high for decision tasks in which the predic-tions align with the predictions of the CPT but very low for decision tasks in which this was not the case. The findings indicate that earlier results supporting the PH might have been caused by the selection of decision tasks that were not diagnostic for the PH as compared to CPT.
Decision Strategy
Fast and Frugal Heuristics
Bounded Rationality
Decision Latency
Process Tracing
Cumulative Prospect Theory
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
379.38 kB

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.