Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Year of Publication: 
[Journal:] Nature Energy [ISSN:] 2058-7546 [Volume:] 7 [Publisher:] Springer Nature [Place:] Berlin [Year:] 2022 [Pages:] 582-587
Springer Nature, Berlin
Whether additional natural gas infrastructure is needed or would be detrimental to achieving climate protection goals is currently highly controversial. Here we combine five perspectives to argue why expansion of the natural gas infrastructure hinders a renewable energy future and is no bridge technology. We highlight that natural gas is a fossil fuel with a significantly underestimated climate impact that hinders decarbonization through carbon lock-in and stranded assets. We propose five ways to avoid common shortcomings for countries that are developing strategies for greenhouse gas reduction: manage methane emissions of the entire natural gas value chain, revise assumptions of scenario analyses with new research insights on greenhouse gas emissions related to natural gas, replace the ‘bridge’ narrative with unambiguous decarbonization criteria, avoid additional natural gas lock-ins and methane leakage, and take climate-related risks in energy infrastructure planning seriously.
energy infrastructure
political economy of energy
Published Version’s DOI: 
Document Type: 
Document Version: 
Accepted Manuscript (Postprint)

Files in This Item:

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.