Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/261749 
Year of Publication: 
2021
Citation: 
[Journal:] Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management (JIEM) [ISSN:] 2013-0953 [Volume:] 14 [Issue:] 2 [Publisher:] OmniaScience [Place:] Barcelona [Year:] 2021 [Pages:] 219-230
Publisher: 
OmniaScience, Barcelona
Abstract: 
Purpose: The shop-floor organization under lean production (LP) has been hotly debated for about three decades. As this organization concept leaves considerable room for interpretation, the content of lean-inspired changes can vary widely. This paper pleads for a contingency view of how LP is implemented and how the outcomes of lean-inspired changes rely on users' interpretations of the concept in particular production contexts. Design/methodology/approach: A case study was conducted in two large Norwegian chemical plants. Data from the observations and interviews were supplemented by interviews with top managers in 2017 and 2018. The first author also followed a management audit in one plant, assessing the plant's overall implementation of the company-specific production system. Findings: The lean-inspired changes in the company had brought about a shop-floor organization typically associated with sociotechnical design (STD), including extensive employee choice autonomy and a broad span of control. Originality/value: Our findings demonstrate the importance of understanding how lean is interpreted in different contexts. Our contingency view may aid organizational designers in making more-informed choices by clarifying relevant issues and trade-offs in lean implementations.
Subjects: 
Lean production
contingency theory
organization concepts
sociotechnical design
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
cc-by-nc Logo
Document Type: 
Article

Files in This Item:
File
Size
282.37 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.