Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/250700 
Year of Publication: 
2022
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 15039
Publisher: 
Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
Despite the prevalence of school tracking, evidence on whether it improves student success is mixed. This paper studies how tracking within high school impacts high-achieving students' short- and longer-term academic outcomes. Our setting is a large and selective Chinese high school, where first-year students are separated into high-achieving and regular classrooms based on their performance on a standardized exam. Classrooms differ in terms of peer ability, teacher quality, class size, as well as level and pace of instruction. Using newly collected administrative data and a regression discontinuity design, we show that high-achieving classrooms improve math test scores by 23 percent of a standard deviation, with effects persisting throughout the three years of high school. Effects on performance in Chinese and English language subjects are more muted. Importantly, we find that high-achieving classrooms substantially raise enrollment in elite universities, as they increase scores on the national college entrance exam—the sole determinant of university admission in China.
Subjects: 
classroom tracking
peer quality
teacher quality
regression discontinuity
China
JEL: 
I21
I24
I26
J24
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
1.98 MB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.