Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Matthey, Astrid
Year of Publication: 
Series/Report no.: 
SFB 649 discussion paper 2005,036
Experimental and field evidence show that people perceive and evaluate new risks differently from risks that are common. In particular, people get used to the presence of certain risks and become less eager to avoid them. We explain this observation by including risks in the reference states of individuals, which requires a more general concept of the reference state than has previously been considered in the literature. We find two effects. First, the inclusion of the risk in the reference state changes its evaluation. A risk being present on the market induces a selfenforcing process of increasing acceptance of this risk without any new information becoming available or people's tastes changing. We term this the risk inclusion effect. Second, a risk with lower inherent (reference-independent) utility may be preferred to a risk with higher inherent utility if individuals are more used to accepting the former than the latter. This leads to inefficient decisions if habituation is seen as contributing less to welfare than inherent utility. Both effects have implications for the optimal regulation of risks.
risk perception
reference-dependent preferences
WTA/WTP disparity
health risk
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
457.39 kB

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.