Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Perrotta Berlin, Maria
Mandl, Benjamin
Year of Publication: 
Series/Report no.: 
SITE Working Paper No. 53
Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm Institute of Transition Economics (SITE), Stockholm
In this paper we try to contribute to the understanding of the persistence and increase of meat eating in the face of mounting evidence on the ills of meat production and consumption by considering the role of selective attention and learning. We aim to test whether agent type plays a role in this process. If this hypothesis is true, simple informational campaigns about the externalities of meat consumption might be ineffective as the informational content may be lost on precisely the population of interest, omnivores. Policy strategies to reach this goal would then need to be refined. Our conclusions apply more generally to a policy agenda for climate-change curbing action, an area where convergence to nudges or strong incentives is proving very hard for policy makers at all levels, and the potential for information to spark action on its own would be very valuable.
meat consumption
meat production
meat industry
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.