Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/246452 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2021
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] Operations Research Perspectives [ISSN:] 2214-7160 [Volume:] 8 [Publisher:] Elsevier [Place:] Amsterdam [Year:] 2021 [Pages:] 1-7
Verlag: 
Elsevier, Amsterdam
Zusammenfassung: 
This research aimed to replace the pairwise comparison function used in Leoneti [2016] with a new function inspired on the exponential model of prospect theory and to perform a comparative analysis to verify the hypothesis that a better performance of the utility function would be possible from the use of a component of judgment better theoretically grounded. A field study consisting of solving three cases in a group was proposed to evaluate the number of matches of the method regarding the decision negotiated by the group, and the number of times that, when there was a match, the group maintained its decision after voting. From an empirical evaluation with a hundred students that participated in the field study, the main hypothesis of this research was confirmed, which is that the use of a pairwise comparison function adhering to a decision and judgment theory increases the predictive capacity of the utility function proposed in Leoneti [2016].
Schlagwörter: 
Utility function
Prospect theory
Game theory
Nash equilibrium
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Creative-Commons-Lizenz: 
cc-by Logo
Dokumentart: 
Article

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
552.43 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.