Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/245705 
Year of Publication: 
2021
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 14654
Publisher: 
Institute of Labor Economics (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
Using information on collective agreements and administrative data on mental ill-health, sickness absence, and job separations, we study the effect of decentralization on well-being at work in Finland. Our regression results with individual-and firm-level fixed effects show that decentralized wage bargaining leads to distinct outcomes for different employee groups. For example, white-collar employees in white-collar intensive firms show increased well-being at work. In contrast, all employees in blue-collar intensive firms show quite strong and negative responses to decentralization. Decentralization affects mostly job-separation behavior and mental ill-health, whereas no consistent effects for sickness absence are observed. Whether the mechanisms between decentralization and worker's well-being is explained by pay dispersion, wage level, or different preferences toward wage policy needs to be explored further.
Subjects: 
decentralization
collective agreements
mental health disorder
sickness absence
job separation
blue-collar
white-collar
JEL: 
J31
J51
J52
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
555.01 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.