Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/242851 
Year of Publication: 
2021
Publisher: 
WZB Berlin Social Science Center, Berlin
Abstract: 
Interdisciplinary research is intensely promoted, but challenged by academic field level demands that hinder the realization of its potential. This paper builds on a qualitative study and asks what means managers use to overcome barriers to interdisciplinary research. First, the study develops a conceptual framework that is based on an institutional logics approach and illustrates contradicting implications of a corporate logic and professional logic scholars are embedded in. Second, the study identifies three tensions that result from coexisting institutional logics and illustrates tactics used to overcome these tensions: Balancing epistemological tensions through boundary objects; Balancing identity tensions through identity work; Balancing evaluative tensions through performance indicators. These tactics help to overcome discrepancies between formal descriptions of interdisciplinary units and the activity structure within these units. Besides its practical relevance for research management and science policy, the results deliver reference points for theory-development in the field of higher education.
Subjects: 
research governance
interdisciplinary research
grand challenges
institutional complexity
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.