Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/237289 
Autor:innen: 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2021
Quellenangabe: 
[Journal:] Financial Innovation [ISSN:] 2199-4730 [Volume:] 7 [Issue:] 1 [Publisher:] Springer [Place:] Heidelberg [Year:] 2021 [Pages:] 1-33
Verlag: 
Springer, Heidelberg
Zusammenfassung: 
Can peer-to-peer lending platforms mitigate fraudulent behaviors? Or have lending players been acting similar to free-riders? This paper constructs a new proxy to investigate lending platform misconduct and compares the FICO score and the LendingClub credit grade. To examine whether the lack of verification by the Fintech platform affects lenders' collection performance, I explore the recovery rate (RR) of non-performing loans through a mixed-continuous model. The regression results show that the degree of prudence taken by the lending platform in the pre-screening activity negatively affects the detection of some misreporting borrowers. I also find that the Fintech platform's missing verification information (e.g., annual income and employment length) affects the RR of non-performing loans, thereby hampering lenders' collection performance.
Schlagwörter: 
Credit grade
Misconduct
Misreporting
Peer to peer lending
Recovery rate
Persistent Identifier der Erstveröffentlichung: 
Creative-Commons-Lizenz: 
cc-by Logo
Dokumentart: 
Article

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
1.37 MB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.