Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/235020 
Year of Publication: 
2020
Series/Report no.: 
AWI Discussion Paper Series No. 697
Publisher: 
University of Heidelberg, Department of Economics, Heidelberg
Abstract: 
An influential result in the literature on charitable giving is that matching subsidies dominate rebate subsidies in raising funds. We investigate whether this result extends to 'unit donation' schemes, a popular alternative form of soliciting donations. There, the donors' choices are about the number of units of a charitable good to fund at a given unit price, rather than the amount of money to give. Comparing matches and rebates as well as simple discounts on the unit price, we find no evidence of dominance in our online experiment: The three subsidy types are equally effective overall. At a more disaggregate level, rebates lead to a higher likelihood of giving while matching and discount subsidies lead to larger donations by donors. This suggests that charities using a unit donation scheme enjoy additional degrees of freedom in choosing a subsidy type. Rebates merit additional consideration if the primary goal is to attract donors.
Subjects: 
Charitable giving
unit donation
subsidies
online field experiment
framing
JEL: 
C93
D12
D64
H24
H41
L31
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.