Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/234618 
Year of Publication: 
2021
Series/Report no.: 
CREMA Working Paper No. 2021-03
Publisher: 
Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Zürich
Abstract: 
We designed and implemented a survey to capture what scientists from around the world think about immunity certification. Responses from 12,738 scientists were captured and their distribution was tabulated by participants in health science and other fields. Half of the scientists surveyed agree that a potential immunity passport program will be good for public health (50.2%) and the economy (54.4%), with 19.1% and 15.4% of participants disagree, respectively. A significant proportion of scientists raised concerns about immunity certification over fairness to others (36.5%) and social inequality (45.5%). There is little consensus in the different aspects of immunity passport among scientists.
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
811.73 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.