Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/230381
Authors: 
Barrow, Lisa
Rouse, Cecilia Elena
McFarland, Amanda
Year of Publication: 
2020
Series/Report no.: 
Working Paper No. 2020-03
Abstract: 
We evaluate the effect of performance-based scholarship programs for postsecondary students on student time use and effort and whether these effects are different for students we hypothesize may be more or less responsive to incentives. To do so, we administered a time-use survey as part of a randomized experiment in which community college students in New York City were randomly assigned to be eligible for a performance-based scholarship or to a control group that was only eligible for the standard financial aid. This paper contributes to the literature by attempting to get inside the "black box" of how students respond to a monetary incentive to improve their educational attainment. We find that students eligible for a scholarship devoted more time to educational activities, increased the quality of effort toward and engagement with their studies, and allocated less time to leisure. Additional analyses suggest that students who were plausibly more myopic - place less weight on future benefits - were more responsive to the incentives, but we find no evidence that students who are arguably more time constrained were less responsive to the incentives.
Subjects: 
higher education
educational investment
time use
incentives
financial aid
JEL: 
J24
D03
I2
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
458.52 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.