Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/224046
Authors: 
Coibion, Olivier
Gorodnichenko, Yuriy
Weber, Michael
Year of Publication: 
2020
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers 13604
Abstract: 
Using a large-scale survey of U.S. consumers, we study how the large one-time transfers to individuals from the CARES Act affected their consumption, saving and labor supply decisions. Most respondents report that they primarily saved or paid down debts with their transfers, with only about 15 percent reporting that they mostly spent it. When providing a detailed breakdown of how they used their checks, individuals report having spent or planning to spend only around 40 percent of the total transfer on average. This relatively low rate of spending out of a one-time transfer is higher for those facing liquidity constraints, who are out of the labor force, who live in larger households, who are less educated and those who received smaller amounts. We find no meaningful effect on labor supply decisions from these transfer payments, except for twenty percent of the unemployed who report that the stimulus payment made them search harder for a job.
Subjects: 
expectations
surveys
marginal propensity to consume
labor supply
fiscal policy
COVID-19
JEL: 
E3
E4
E5
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
498.61 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.