Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/222129 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2020
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
Discussion Paper No. 232
Verlag: 
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München und Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Collaborative Research Center Transregio 190 - Rationality and Competition, München und Berlin
Zusammenfassung: 
Empirical evidence on distributional preferences shows that people do not judge inequality as problematic per se but that they take the underlying sources of income differences into account. In contrast to this evidence, current measures of inequality do not adequately reflect these normative preferences. In this paper we address this shortcoming by developing a new measure of unfair inequality that reconciles two widely-held fairness principles: equality of opportunity and freedom from poverty. We provide two empirical applications of our measure. First, we analyze the development of inequality in the US from 1969 to 2014 from a normative perspective. Second, we conduct a corresponding international comparison between the US and 31 European countries in 2010. Our results document increasing unfairness in the US over time. This trend is driven by a strong decrease in social mobility that puts the "land of opportunity" among the most unfair countries in 2010.
Schlagwörter: 
Inequality
Equality of Opportunity
Poverty
Fairness
Measurement
JEL: 
D31
D63
I32
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
3.49 MB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.