Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/222127 
Year of Publication: 
2020
Series/Report no.: 
Discussion Paper No. 230
Publisher: 
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München und Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Collaborative Research Center Transregio 190 - Rationality and Competition, München und Berlin
Abstract: 
In a symmetric repeated game with standard preferences, there are no gains from intertemporal trade. In fact, under a suitable normalization of utility, the payoff set in the repeated game is identical to that in the stage game. We show that this conclusion may no longer be true if preferences are recursive and stationary, but not time separable. If so, the players' rates of time preference are no longer fixed, but may vary endogenously, depending on what transpires in the course of the game. This creates opportunities for intertemporal trade, giving rise to new and interesting dynamics. For example, the efficient and symmetric outcome of a repeated prisoner's dilemma may be to take turns defecting, even though the efficient and symmetric outcome of the stage game is to cooperate. A folk theorem shows that such dynamics can be sustained in equilibrium if the players are sufficiently patient.
Subjects: 
Repeated games
efficiency
folk theorems
endogenous discounting
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
522.49 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.