Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/220203 
Year of Publication: 
2015
Series/Report no.: 
Discussion Paper No. 114
Publisher: 
Institute for Applied Economic Research (ipea), Brasília
Abstract: 
Fiscal competition is a desirable feature insofar as it promotes a better match between local policies and the preferences of residents, and creates an environment for experimentation of different policies, with the best outcomes surviving through a mechanism of natural selection. Furthermore, fiscal competition may prevent overexpansion of government activities. However, in a world where mobility of economic agents is high and growing, local jurisdictions ability to select and attract firms and individuals through the use of their tax structure and public spending has substantially increased. In such a setting, local governments (as well as states belonging to a federation or sovereign units forming an economic union) may engage in a competition to attract business investment or tax bases, giving rise to all sorts of economic distortions. Moreover, fiscal competition may considerably weaken the redistributive power of government actions. The basic challenge is, therefore, to avoid or reduce the undesirable effects of fiscal competition while preserving all or most of its benefits. Intergovernmental transfers and harmonization of taxation and of other fiscal policies are the most promising instruments to attain this goal.
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
361.64 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.