Bitte verwenden Sie diesen Link, um diese Publikation zu zitieren, oder auf sie als Internetquelle zu verweisen: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/216962 
Erscheinungsjahr: 
2019
Schriftenreihe/Nr.: 
Hannover Economic Papers (HEP) No. 662
Verlag: 
Leibniz Universität Hannover, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät, Hannover
Zusammenfassung: 
Because accountability may improve the comparability that is compromised by lenient grading, we compare exit exam outcomes in the same schools before and after a policy change that increased teacher accountability by anchoring grading scales. In particular, using a large administrative dataset of 364,445 exit exam outcomes for 72,889 students, we assess the effect of introducing centralized scoring standards into schools with higher and lower quality peer groups. We find that implementation of these standards increases scoring differences between the two school types by about 25 percent.
Schlagwörter: 
Subjective performance evaluation
rating standards
policy reform
transparency
JEL: 
H83
I20
I28
Dokumentart: 
Working Paper

Datei(en):
Datei
Größe
363.55 kB





Publikationen in EconStor sind urheberrechtlich geschützt.