Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/21530
Authors: 
Hartog, Joop
Vijverberg, Wim P. M.
Year of Publication: 
2002
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion paper series 426
Abstract: 
Utility theory suggests that foreseeable risk should increase the compensation for work. This paper expands on this notion: on basis of utility theory, people should care not only about risk but also about the skewness in the distribution of the compensation paid. In particular, because the degree of risk aversion ought to decrease with income, people should appreciate a small chance of a substantial gain; they should exhibit an ?affection? for skewness. To test these hypotheses, this paper carefully develops various measures of risk and skewness by occupational/educational classification of the worker and finds supportive evidence: wages rise with occupational earnings variance and decrease with skewness. In order to identify the discount rate and the degree of risk aversion, we also apply structural modelling of education and occupational choice and allow for non-lognormal wage distributions.
Subjects: 
Wage variability
wage risk compensation
JEL: 
J3
D8
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
373.28 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.