Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/214394 
Year of Publication: 
2007
Series/Report no.: 
CREMA Working Paper No. 2007-20
Publisher: 
Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA), Basel
Abstract: 
Democratic elections look very much like a contest where voters have to compare the candidates according to an ordinal ranking. Nevertheless, the theory of tournaments has not yet been applied to Political Economics. Therefore, we deploy tournament models to analyse elections. The main difference between tournaments in a firm and election tournaments is a systematic asymmetry between the contestants: whereas the voters have plenty of information about the incumbent, they hardly know anything about the challenger. Unlike most models of political accountability that model the challenger as a standard, we focus on the specific role of the challenger and model him as a random draw with a given expected ability. Consequently the ordinal ranking of the candidates contains plenty of noise, which weakens the incumbent's incentives to exert e€ort. After the presentation of the basic model, several extensions of the tournament theme in politics are explored. The model gives a fresh insight into very important aspects of politics, such as sabotage and selection, and it identifies exective policy reforms, e.g. the deregulation of politics.
Subjects: 
Tournament
Political Agency
Elections
JEL: 
D8
D72
H11
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
205.76 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.