Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/213005
Authors: 
Sellare, Jorge
Meemken, Eva-Maria
Qaim, Matin
Year of Publication: 
2020
Series/Report no.: 
GlobalFood Discussion Papers 136
Abstract: 
It is often assumed that voluntary sustainability standards - such as Fairtrade - could not only improve the socioeconomic wellbeing of smallholder farmers in developing countries but could also help to reduce negative health and environmental impacts of agricultural production. The empirical evidence is thin, as most previous studies on the impact of sustainability standards only focused on economic indicators, such as prices, yields, and incomes. Here, we argue that Fairtrade and other sustainability standards can affect agrochemical input use through various mechanisms with possible positive and negative effects. We use data from farmers and rural workers in Cote d'Ivoire to analyze effects of Fairtrade certification on fertilizer and pesticide use, as well as on human health and environmental toxicity. Fairtrade increases chemical input quantities and aggregated levels of toxicity. Nevertheless, Fairtrade reduces the incidence of pesticide-related acute health symptoms among farmers and workers. Certified cooperatives are more likely to offer training and other services related to the safe handling of pesticides and occupational health, which can reduce negative externalities in spite of higher input quantities. These results suggest that simplistic assumptions about the health and environmental effects of sustainability standards may be inappropriate.
Subjects: 
Agrochemicals
certification
Fairtrade
pesticides
sustainability standards
toxicity
JEL: 
O12
Q01
Q12
Q13
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
796.67 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.