Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/21266 
Year of Publication: 
2001
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion Papers No. 406
Publisher: 
Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA), Bonn
Abstract: 
This paper explicitly differentiates between unemployment and inactivity, by defining inactivity as a state in which individuals do not search for jobs when non-employed. Facing changes in the value of inactivity, individuals transit through three labor market states. In steady-state, we hence have a theory of equilibrium unemployment determined by both matching frictions and labor market participation margins. The paper firstly rationalizes and quantitatively accounts for the existence of large flows between employment, unemployment and inactivity. Secondly, it shows that unemployment and aggregate wages rise because some of the employed workers are unattached to the labor force, in the sense that they join the inactive pool when they lose a job. Thirdly, unemployment income has little effects on employment, since it attracts people into the labor force and rises the share of attached workers. Finally, our theory suggests that contrary to two-state models, taxation of market activity increases non-participation, unattachment and adversely affects unemployment.
Subjects: 
Unemployment
matching
home production
JEL: 
J2
J30
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
566.93 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.