Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/210928
Authors: 
Daunfeldt, Sven-Olov
Mihaescu, Oana
Öner, Özge
Rudholm, Niklas
Year of Publication: 
2019
Series/Report no.: 
IFN Working Paper 1287
Abstract: 
Opponents of big-box entry argue that large retail establishments generate noise and other types of pollution and a variety of negative externalities associated with traffic. Big-box advocates, on the other hand, argue that access to a large retail market delivers not only direct economic benefits but also a variety of positive spillover effects and therefore can be considered a consumer amenity that increases the attractiveness of the entry location. To test the validity of these competing arguments, we use the entry of IKEA in Sweden as a quasi-experiment and empirically investigate whether increased access to retail affects place attractiveness, which is proxied by residential property values. We find that IKEA entry increases the prices of the properties sold in the entry cities by, on average, 4.4% or 60,425 SEK (approximately 6,400 USD), but this effect is statistically insignificant for the properties in the immediate vicinity of the new IKEA retail trade area. In addition, we observe an attenuation of the effect with distance from the new IKEA store and the associated retail trade area, where the properties located 10 km away experience a 2% price increase. Our results are in line with some previous findings regarding the effects of entry by Walmart or supermarket stores in the US and show that large retailers have the potential to increase place attractiveness, but perhaps not in the immediate vicinity of the new establishment.
Subjects: 
Retail trade
Large retailers
Property values
Place attractiveness
Difference-in-differences estimation
JEL: 
D22
P25
R12
R32
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
458.83 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.