Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/210881 
Year of Publication: 
2019
Series/Report no.: 
ESRB Working Paper Series No. 106
Publisher: 
European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB), European System of Financial Supervision, Frankfurt a. M.
Abstract: 
Do politics matter for macroprudential policy? I show that changes to macroprudential regulation exhibit a predictable electoral cycle in the run-up to 221 elections across 58 countries from 2000 through 2014. Policies restricting mortgages and consumer credit are systematically less likely to be tightened before elections during credit booms and economic expansions. Consistent with theories of opportunistic political cycles, this pattern is stronger when election outcomes are uncertain or in countries where political interference is more likely. In contrast to monetary policy, I find limited evidence that central banks are uniquely insulated from political cycles in macroprudential policy. These results suggest that political pressures may limit the ability of regulators to "lean against the wind."
Subjects: 
macroprudential regulation
electoral cycles
regulatory cycles
political economy
central bank independence
JEL: 
G18
G21
G28
D72
D73
P16
Persistent Identifier of the first edition: 
ISBN: 
978-92-9472-120-4
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.