Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10419/208050 
Year of Publication: 
2019
Series/Report no.: 
Discussion Paper No. 150
Publisher: 
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München und Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Collaborative Research Center Transregio 190 - Rationality and Competition, München und Berlin
Abstract: 
Information about past performance has been found to sometimes improve and sometimes worsen subsequent performance. Two factors may help to explain this puzzle: which aspect of one's past performance the information refers to and when it is revealed. In a field experiment in secondary schools, students received information about their absolute rank in the last math exam (level feedback), their change in ranks between the second-last and the last math exam (change feedback), or no feedback. Feedback was given either 1-3 days (early) or immediately (late) before the final math exam of the semester. Both level feedback and change feedback significantly improve students' grades in the final exam when given early and tend to worsen them when given late. The largest effects are found for negative change feedback and are concentrated on male students, who adjust their ability beliefs downwards in response to feedback.
Subjects: 
timing of feedback
type of feedback
beliefs
education
field experiment
JEL: 
D83
D91
I21
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size
593.03 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.