Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Addison, John T.
Surfield, Christopher J.
Year of Publication: 
Series/Report no.: 
IZA Discussion paper series 1477
Atypical work, or alternative work arrangements in U.S. parlance, has long been criticized for providing poorly-compensated employment. Although one group of atypical workers (contractors) seems to enjoy a wage premium, our cross-section results from the CPS and NLSY for the better-known category of temporary workers point to a negative wage differential of some 7-12 percent. It emerges that much of the latter disparity stems from unobserved worker heterogeneity (accounting for which supports a wage advantage for contracting work). Turning to fringes, the appearance in cross section of a potentially large deficit in atypical worker health benefits is again reduced after accounting for permanent unobserved individual heterogeneity. But on this occasion the reduction is very modest. Further, there is now some indication that the wage advantage of contract workers partly compensates for their reduced access to such benefits.
atypical/contingent work
alternative work arrangements
wage differentials
employer-related health insurance
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
382.59 kB

Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.