Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/203093
Authors: 
Seip, Marcel
Castaldi, Carolina
Flikkema, Meindert
De Man, Ard-Pieter
Year of Publication: 
2019
Series/Report no.: 
LEM Working Paper Series 2019/03
Abstract: 
Current debates on the social returns of Intellectual Property Right (IPR) systems deal with the presumed negative effects of two practices: IPR bundling and the strong concentration of IPRs in certain firms and industries. These debates are hampered by the lack of empirical evidence on IPR application practices. This study presents unique and comprehensive data about firm-level IPR application practices in the Netherlands. We develop a taxonomy based on the firm-level variety and intensity of IPR applications. We identify five archetypes of IPR applicants: patent rookies, trademark rookies, IPR strategists, IPR specialists and IPR generalists. Our findings show that a few large firms in high-tech industries combine high IPR application variety and high IPR application intensity. However, high variety is also associated with low intensity and low variety with high intensity. For a large majority of the firms, IPR application is equivalent to single trademark application or the ad hoc application of another IPR. We discuss the implications of our findings for current IPR debates and for further research.
Subjects: 
Intellectual property rights
taxonomy
policy
JEL: 
O34
O39
Document Type: 
Working Paper
Social Media Mentions:

Files in This Item:
File
Size
509.67 kB





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.