Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/202667
Authors: 
Fender, John
Year of Publication: 
2016
Series/Report no.: 
Birmingham Business School Discussion Paper Series 2016-03
Abstract: 
Although there are many stock market anomalies which the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) finds difficult to explain, it also has its strengths, and so far no alternative hypothesis has been developed which can explain what the EMH explains but which can also do a better job in explaining the phenomena with which it struggles. It is argued that the way forward is to postulate that the stock market can be in one of three states: a fundamental state, in which share prices are determined as in the EMH, a bubble or bull market state, in which share prices are above their fundamental levels but continue to rise because asset holders expect to sell the shares at even higher prices in the future, and a bear market state, in which shares are held exclusively by 'irrational' agents and rational agents cannot exploit the overvaluation because of short-selling constraints. It is also argued that heterogeneous rational expectations may help explain some features of stock market behaviour.
Subjects: 
efficient market hypothesis
rational expectations
bubbles
bear markets
short-selling constraints
JEL: 
G1
URL of the first edition: 
Creative Commons License: 
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.5/
Document Type: 
Working Paper

Files in This Item:
File
Size





Items in EconStor are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.